Tag Archives: Executable

Ad-Hoc Processes

Posted on February 23, 2009 by Frank Michael Kraft

Unstructured, Semi-Structured and Structured Processes makes a distinction between structured, unstructured and semi-structured processes, that I like. It is interesting, that in the definition of process the emphasis on the post is less on the sequence of activities, but more … Continue reading →

Posted in BPMN in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

General Considerations about the Executable Modeling Debate

Posted on January 28, 2009 by Frank Michael Kraft

[ad] As a general consideration the underlying problem discussed in the executable modeling debate is this: If Process Modeling is done, there are different purposes for it, as I already stated: http://www.bpmnforum.net/blog/bpmn/bpmn-in-practice/process-modeling-purpose/ and http://www.bpmnforum.net/blog/bpmn/bpmn-in-practice/more-on-modeling-purpose/ And yes – most BPMN models … Continue reading →

Posted in BPMN Standard, Model Driven Development | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Executable BPMN 2.0

Posted on January 27, 2009 by Frank Michael Kraft

[ad] There have been complaints, that BPMN 2.0 is only designed with the goal of defining an executable process modeling language and that this impairs the usage of the modeling language for the purposes that it is currently most often … Continue reading →

Posted in BPMN, BPMN Standard, Model Driven Development | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment