Gleanings of the WfMC Thought Leadership Summit
Some reflections about the WfMC Thought Leadership Summit that I was invited to attend.
Suddenly I felt like in a lively discussion about what I thought for some time about the inflexibility of BPM models (what if the approver is on leave?), the ad-hoc nature of real processes (like in a court trial) and the small amount of system support for these.
Yes, Business Process Modeling to a degree rests on the assumption, that there are repetitive procedures that are triggered by a business transaction, and which is described in terms of which steps to execute as a result of it. Like a machine.
Did you ever wonder why there is so little standard software for startups – or business process models? If it where a standard process, it were not a startup. The driver in the seat hopefully is the founder of the startup, not a process.
I agree to the observation, that there are much more processes like this all over the place. And maybe there should be even more again, reverting the feeling to be but a cogwheel in the engine, but a responsible contributor – even for the benefit of the whole.
Still, what we need to work effective is system support for
- our information
- Collaboration and Communication over the information
- a clear status of all of the process and all parts of it
- Decide about next steps as you go
- Decide about required information as you go
- Decide about groups and access policies as you go
- Decide about information structure as you go.
- Overview and Tracking
Only to mention the most important ones.
This is not what you can to with BPM . Therefore we need a new breed of software which is not BPM, even if it is related to it.
I want to mention two things, that were not or not deeply discussed in the meeting as an additional contribution and defence of what I said.
First: Even with all the ad-hoc type of processes it is clear that over time some of them evolve in standard processes, which is a good thing. Because that is the time to earn money for the process owner. So there must be ways to
- pick best practices and develop them into standard processes
- re-design a bunch of local best practices into a global standard process.
- impose constraints of a standard process on the business
All of that as you go – i.e. without interfering the running processes.
Which is easily said – sounds a little like marketing buzz – but certainly challenging in terms of technology. But I wouldn’t say it, if I didn’t think it’s possible.
In Process design and re-design I disagree here with Max J. Poucher’s more philosophical statements about evolution. I do not believe as much in evolution as an unguided process as he seemingly does. I believe that redesigning processes as a whole makes them more effective, and more rewarding to everybody if done right.
Second, I think that we need is a seamless integration (A word that you first learn in marketing) with structured processes – be they classical workflows or classical ERP processes. In my opinion there is much ROI to be found.
Related Blog Posts
Adaptive Case Management by Max J. Pucher
Complex Adaptive Business Process by Max J. Pucher
Intelligence in Business Processes by me
Social Links